Farm reality
Land, production and the capacity to operate need verification on the ground.
FYIELD / PARTNERSHIP OVERVIEW
We collect, verify and organise farm information so institutions can assess the business with more context.
Agriculture first. Built for institutional partners.
November 2026
A fuller picture
of capability.
Source records. Verification status.
History that stays in context.
01 / THE EVIDENCE GAP
Land, operating capability and sales do not always appear together in a conventional financial record.
Land, production and the capacity to operate need verification on the ground.
Sales, costs and supporting documents can be fragmented across different sources.
Institutions need a consistent picture of the business, its risks and the gaps that remain.
Consent and source records accompany the profile. The financial institution retains the lending decision.
02 / THE OPERATING LIFECYCLE
A repeatable process connects the farmer’s information with institutional assessment and continuing observation.
Understand the farmer, the business and the financing need.
Gather consent, identity, production and financial records.
Check documents and observations from the field.
Build a case file with findings, risks and open gaps.
Support the institution’s assessment and financing process.
Record performance and shared repayment outcomes.
The onboarding and verification process is documented. A complete institutional pilot is the next milestone for financing and outcome collection.
03 / THE EVIDENCE
Each profile is designed to connect farm information with supporting records and a verification status.
| Evidence area | What the profile records |
|---|---|
| 01 Identity and assets | Business identity, land, location and infrastructure |
| 02 Production | Crops, capacity, historical yields and operating costs |
| 03 Markets and cash flow | Sales evidence, buyer relationships and financial records |
| 04 Financing readiness | Use of funds, repayment assumptions, risks and unresolved gaps |
Verified observations and unresolved gaps stay distinguishable. A profile gives the institution the context to ask better questions.
Our data approach04 / THE DATA FOUNDATION
The long-term aim is to combine relevant alternative data with traditional financial records for future risk assessment.
Production, sales and operating activity
Transactions and repayment outcomes
A history that develops across production cycles
Evidence for future model development
and institutional validation
Planned data architecture. Partner data access, consent and integration are still to be agreed.
05 / WHERE WE ARE
A registered Nigerian company with a defined verification process and an institutional pilot to build.
THE FIRST INSTITUTIONAL PILOT
Select an eligible farm and define the institution’s information requirements.
Complete verification, document risks and track the decision.
Monitor farm performance and receive permissioned outcome data.
Assess data quality, operating cost and usefulness to the institution.
06 / THE COMMERCIAL APPROACH
The initial proposal links fees to successful financing facilitation.
The fee base, payer, timing and responsibilities will be agreed with each partner.
Over time, FYIELD may develop verification, monitoring and data services for institutions.
07 / THE TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP
The future product must earn its reliability through data, observed outcomes and validation.
Standardise collection, verification and traceability.
Build histories of operations and shared repayments.
Test whether the combined data improves assessment.
Evaluate reliability, bias and usefulness in decisions.
Planned roadmap. FYIELD does not currently issue official credit scores or make lending decisions.
08 / THE PARTNERSHIP OPPORTUNITY
Assess a farm case and shape the evidence requirements.
Define consented access to financial and repayment records.
Agree resources for fieldwork, monitoring and learning.